Start with a shared data contract.
I worked across teams to define common AI delivery metrics. Consistent contracts helped turn different implementations into useful reporting without pretending every team worked the same way.
Telemetry, evaluation, and integration work to help teams understand what their AI was costing and how well it was performing.
AI activity was spread across teams with different pipelines, workloads, and definitions of success. Cost alone could not tell the full story. Teams needed useful signals about usage and output quality, and leadership needed a shared view that made those signals comparable.
I worked across teams to define common AI delivery metrics. Consistent contracts helped turn different implementations into useful reporting without pretending every team worked the same way.
I built Python telemetry ingestion and LLM payload parsing for token usage, latency, and throughput. Quality and drift flagging, together with human-review tooling, added context to the cost picture.
Discovery and governance involved the five highest-spending organizations. Integration wrappers and middleware addressed differences in schemas, rate limits, and regional compute boundaries.
Explanatory system view · reconstructed from the project
I contributed the ingestion, parsing, flagging, and review tooling, including a React reporting interface. I also worked with infrastructure and partner teams to resolve integration issues and make the metrics useful across organizational boundaries.
The work spanned 20+ teams and business units, with focused discovery and governance involving the five highest-spending internal organizations. It brought resource tracking and quality signals into reporting that could inform decisions about AI deployments.
The organizational scope describes the breadth of the work. It is not a count of independently verified services or deployments, and no specific dollar savings are claimed here. The internship ended in August 2026.
A better way to be understood.